Legal Opinion
In re Oddo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Respondent, a naturalized citizen, moves to vacate an ex parte order issued by the United States District Court pursuant to § 235(a) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1225(a), directing him to appear and give testimony with respect to the legality of his naturalization “and other pertinent matters.” The order was obtained on the basis of an affidavit of an attorney in the office of the District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, who alleged that the respondent was the subject of an investigation concerning the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Abraham MinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- States v. JeromeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Lansky v. SavorettiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. WalusDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Jack Lansky v. Joseph Savoretti, District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, Florida, Sylvia Shandloff v. Joseph Savoretti, District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955