Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Ball

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from. Clinton District Court. — Hon.W. F. Brannan, Judge. Action to recover wages assigned to plaintiff by one Charles Brown, who at the time of the assignment was, and fer some time thereafter continued to be, au employe of the defendant. There was an answer for defendant in several divisions.

Read the full summary

Appeal from. Clinton District Court. — Hon.W. F. Brannan, Judge. Action to recover wages assigned to plaintiff by one Charles Brown, who at the time of the assignment was, and fer some time thereafter continued to be, au employe of the defendant. There was an answer for defendant in several divisions. Plaintiff moved to strike oiat some of' the divisions of the answer, and, on the overruling of his motion, elected to stand thereon, and judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

It is alleged in the petition that Charles Brown, being indebted to plaintiff on account, and being in the employ of defendant, executed and delivered to-plaintiff a written assignment of a portion of the wages' which should become due to him from defendant, suclr. assignment being in the following language: “Clinton,, Iowa, Dec. 2.1, 1898. Bor valuable consideration, I hereby assign, transfer and set over to J. M. Petersen the amount of $1.00 per week due me from my wages until May 1, 1899, and then $2.00 a week until Nov. 1, 1899, and so on until bill is paid up, the amount of one hundred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metcalf v. KincaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Bremer County Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Engeldinger v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Coyle v. Des Moines Gately's, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Rodijkeit v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API