City of Winston-Salem v. Ashby
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksON, J.
The only question involved, necessary to be considered on this appeal: Must the plaintiff as a condition precedent attempt to acquire by purchase or negotiate with the owners of the land sought to be condemned? This necessitates the construction of the statutes relating to the query.
The plaintiff alleges in its complaint: “That the city has been unable to acquire title to said parcels of land which are needed for said improvement, for the reason that the defendants and the city have been unable to agree upon the purchase price, and for the further reason that some of the defendants are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Durham v. Rigsbee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Allen v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Hickory v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Application of Loup River Public Power Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- State Highway Commission v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Virginia Electric & Power Company v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Jones v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.