Legal Opinion

St. Pierre v. Nielsen

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 2018No. 1:17-cv-01344Published

1Opinion of the CourtYvette Kane, District Judge

Before the Court is Defendants Kirstjen Nielsen, Chad A. Readler, William C. Peachey, and Jeffrey S. Robins' (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants") motion to dismiss Plaintiff Frantzy St. Pierre's ("Plaintiff") amended complaint pursuant to *435Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 8.) For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Background

Plaintiff initiated the above-captioned action on July 31, 2017 by filing a complaint against Defendants pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 etseq., in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API