Legal Opinion
People v. Davidson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 2013No. B244607PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Over 40 years ago and during the infancy of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602] (Miranda), Justice Macklin Fleming articulated the rule which controls the Miranda issue in this case: “When circumstances demand immediate investigation by the police, the most useful, most available tool for such investigation is general on-the-scene questioning, designed to bring out the person’s explanation or lack of explanation of the circumstances which aroused the suspicion of the police, and enable the police to quickly determine whether they should allow…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. M.S. (In re M.S.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. B.M. (In Re B.M.)California Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re Destany H. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re M.B. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re M.S.California Court of Appeal · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.