Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 6, 1997No. 15564Published

1ConcurrenceMcdonald, J.

I join in the majority’s disposition of this appeal.

I do not believe, however, that we should jettison the requirement that a party must show a legal relation to another from whom indemnity is claimed as enunciated in Atkinson v. Berloni, 23 Conn. App. 325, 327-28, 580 A.2d 84 (1990). Where a person is not in control of the situation and that person’s negligence is not the direct, immediate cause of an injury, that person may be liable only if he or she has some kind of legal relationship with the negligent party in exclusive control of the situation whose negligence is the direct, immediate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Frazer v. A. F. Munsterman, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Atkinson v. BerloniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Bailey v. BussingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  5. RINGSBYT TRUCK LINES, INC. v. BradfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API