Legal Opinion

ERI Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Swinnea

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2010No. 07-1042PublishedCited by 329 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

The principal question in this case is whether consideration received for the sale of a business interest is subject to equitable forfeiture as a remedy for breach of fiduciary duty. We hold that when a partner in a business breached his fiduciary duty by fraudulently inducing another partner to buy out his interest, the consideration received by the breaching party for his interest in the business is subject to forfeiture as a remedy for the breach, in addition to other damages that result from the tortious conduct. Here, the trial court ordered equitable forfeiture, but the court of appeals…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by329 opinions

  1. First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of AltonTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lezlea Ross v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Andrew Anderson v. Jerry v. Durant, Jerry v. Durant, Inc. D/B/A Durant Toyota and D/B/A Jerry Durant Toyota, Jerry Durant Hyundai, LLC, Doyle Maynard, and Robert G. Cote, Sr., Gary Michael Deere, Jerry Rash, and Elliot "scooter" MichelsonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016

324 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API