Legal Opinion

In re Brooks

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 24, 2005No. 26057Published

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, a Panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Panel) found that Walter W. Brooks (Respondent) violated Rules 7(a)(1), 7(a)(3), 7(a)(4), 7(a)(5), and 7(a)(7) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR, as well as Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR. The Panel recommended that Respondent receive an indefinite suspension from the practice of law, retroactive to the date of his 1996 definite suspension, and that Respondent pay the costs of this action. We agree.

*301Factual/Procedural Background

In 1980,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. In the Matter of RushtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Matter of BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. In re BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. In re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API