Legal Opinion

Young v. IMO Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil Action 94-12508-MBBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #124); DEFENDANT IMO INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 126)

BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before this court is a motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Paul F. Young (“Young”), Matteo J. Panarelli (“Panarelli”) and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO (“the union”) (collectively: “plaintiffs”) and a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Imo Industries, Inc. (“Imo”). After conducting a hearing on October 17, 2007, this court took the summary judgment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
Coll v. PB Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
Donald A. JENSEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
Smart v. Gillette Co. Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
Poulis Minott v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.