Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Citizens Bank of Live Oak

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

*352Rehearing.

Parkhill, J.

A petition for rehearing having been filed herein, it is contended that Barton, who was then the partner of McLeod, was likewise the President of the Citizens Bank of Live Oak and was acting in such capacity and therefore the agent of such bank. It is also contended “that not only, as said by this court in its opinion, 'that Mr. Barton was to draw a partnership draft for $3,000.00 to be deposited with the bank, five hundred of which was to be credited to the defendant or applied for defendant in payment of the shares of stock/ but the evidence of every witness concerning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Camp v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Strobhar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Camp v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  4. Raney v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  5. State ex rel. Sanchez v. CallSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Horter v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Alexander v. RhineSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  5. Crosby v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API