Toohey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentCrawford, Chief Judge
Petitioner has raised the issue of post-trial delay before the court below and that issue is currently pending before the Court of Criminal Appeals.1 This Court abuses its authority and its -writ jurisdiction by directing the lower court to rule, and suggesting how it should rule, on an issue that is already properly before it on direct review. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.
The court below is well aware of this Court’s jurisprudence in the area of post-trial delay,2 and is quite capable of applying that jurisprudence to the facts of this case. It is most inappropriate for this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. FrischholzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- Diaz v. The Judge Advocate General of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.