Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Atchley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 18, 2006No. 1050629Published

1DissentSee, Justice

I dissent from the decision not to issue the writ and order the Court of Criminal Appeals to vacate its judgment compelling Judge Jenifer C. Holt to recuse herself from this case.

The Court of Criminal Appeals granted Hal Maxim Atchley’s mandamus petition *770premised on the ground that Canon 3.C. of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics compels Judge Jenifer C. Holt, the trial judge in his murder trial, to recuse herself. Judge Holt’s recusal is being required, it appears, because Atchley, the criminal defendant in this murder case, alleges that some 20 years before he appeared in Judge Holt’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Acromag-Viking v. BlalockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Ex Parte BalogunSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API