Legal Opinion

Acromag-Viking v. Blalock

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 1, 1982No. 80-758, 81-313PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The central issue of this case is whether a trial judge who was on the board of directors of a publishing concern which employed one of the named defendants should have recused himself from the case. This court finds it unnecessary to discuss any of the other issues raised by appeal and reverses the decision of the trial court.

Acromag-Viking, Inc. (Acromag) filed a two-count complaint against Marketing of the Gulf, Inc. (Marketing) and Andrew Blalock. The first count claimed $29,844.64 on itemized verified account from Marketing. The second count claimed $29,844.64 from Andrew Blalock,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Textron, Inc. v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Nunn v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Borders v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. LavoieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API