Williams v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Reid. January 21, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. The negligence upon which the plaintiff predicates his claim for damages is that the engine on which the plaintiff was working was not equipped with handholds for use by the firemen in going from his cab toward the front of his engine in order to light the headlight; that, in the absence of these handholds, there projected from the engine a certain piece of iron upon which was usually placed a light, the top of which was used by the defendant’s servants as a handhold and as a means of moving around in front of the engine for the purpose of lighting the headlight, no handhold being…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Babcock Bros. Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Quirouet v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Hamilton v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Box v. Atlantic & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Southern Railway Co. v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Hudgins v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931