Dean v. Handy & Harman
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
This is a diversity action controlled by Pennsylvania law which the defendant, Caterpillar, Inc., removed here with the concurrence of the other defendants.
The plaintiffs, Robert Dean, Robert G. Glassmyer, Kenneth Hite, Jr., George Leathery, Jr., Van D. Poff, John Noll, and Melvin H. Weekley, are workers or former workers at the plant Caterpillar operated in York, Pennsylvania. They sued Caterpillar and three other defendants, Handy & Harman, Lucas-Milhaupt, Inc., and Englehard Corp., in state court, alleging that they were seriously injured…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Poyser v. Newman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.