In Re the Marriage of Boyer
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
We granted further review in this dissolution of marriage case in order to resolve a question on which the court of appeals is divided. Under federal legislation, social security benefits for the most part are beyond the reach of those seeking satisfaction of state court judgments, and state courts are generally without power to order otherwise. The question here is whether, in ordering the division of marital property, a court may consider the fact that one party can anticipate greater social security benefits upon retirement. We agree that a court cannot “divide” the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Marriage of SchisselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
3Cited by26 opinions
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of CrookIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Marriage of RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.