Legal Opinion

Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. Hayt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Clinton. (Y. H. Smith, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

Plaintiff sued tbe defendant to recover damages for the killing of certain colts owned by him, by running upon them one of its trains. The breach of duty charged upon the defendant was that while operating its railroad it “did not maintain a fence of the height and strength required by law, or sufficient to prevent cattle or other animals from getting on its said railroad on the south side thereof, in the township of Ovid, aforesaid, at a place other than at a street or farm crossing or at or about station grounds, but on the contrary thereof, the said defendant, at the time and place…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bell v. PateMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Philip v. HeratyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API