Legal Opinion
State v. Diaz-Rubio
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 1993No. 92-KA-747PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
615 So.2d 1124 (1993)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Jorge DIAZ-RUBIO.
No. 92-KA-747.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
March 17, 1993.
Mark P. Burton, Gretna, for appellant/defendant Jorge Diaz-Rubio.
John M. Mamoulides, Dist. Atty., Howat Peters, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Research and Appeals Court, Gretna, for appellee State.
Before GAUDIN, DUFRESNE and CANNELLA, JJ.
CANNELLA, Judge.
Defendant, Jorge Diaz-Rubio, filed a Motion To Suppress The Evidence, Confession and Identification and it was denied by the district court. The defendant thereafter pled guilty,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- State v. GentrasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- State v. FlaggLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.