Legal Opinion

State v. Sua

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1999No. 21480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that receipt of a witness’s grand jury testimony under the past recollection recorded exception to the rule against hearsay at the criminal trial of Defendant-Appellant Alomalietoa Sua (Defendant) violated the right of confrontation guaranteed him by the Hawaii Constitution. We conclude the witness’s grand jury testimony was not imbued with such indicia of reliability as would comport with the substance of the protections afforded under that guarantee. Under such circumstances, we determine that the resulting error was not harmless beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API