Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Fields

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2007No. 25455Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I respectfully dissent.

In his Application for Writ of Certiorari Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Reginald Fields (Petitioner or Fields) contends that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (the ICA) gravely erred (1) by failing to find that the admission of the hearsay statements of Melinda Staggs (Staggs) and Dave Richards (Richards) did not violate the confrontation clause of the Hawai'i Constitution, (2) by declining to find plain error and in abdicating judicial review in favor of a Hawai'i Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 40 Petition, and (3) by not vacating…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API