Richard Fleming v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Richard Max Fleming, M.D., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”) seeking damages for the loss of his medical license as a result of his felony conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.2010). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Hartmann v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.2013). We affirm.
The district court properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Shawna Hartmann v. California Department of Corr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Serra v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnard v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Richard Max Fleming, M.D. v. Iowa Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016