Legal Opinion

Round v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

During the month of December, 1934, plaintiff, a man of 51 years of age, was an em ployee of the Oregon "Worsted Company, in Multnomah county, Oregon. Plaintiff and his employer were operating under the provisions of the Workman’s Compensation Law (section 49-1801, et seq., Oregon Code 1930). On December 4, 1934, plaintiff received an injury to his shoulder and thereafter applied to the Industrial Accident Commission for compensation, in accordance with said act, which was allowed on January 4, 1935. Within 60 days from the date of said allowance, plaintiff petitioned for a rehearing and said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bobell v. WagenaarOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wiesmann v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KellerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
  2. Christman v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Reynolds v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API