Christman v. Scott
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEossman, C. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the circuit court which was entered in favor of the defendant after the appellant had introduced his evidence and the court had sustained a demurrer submitted at that juncture by the respondent to the amended complaint. The demurrer was predicated upon contentions that the amended complaint did not state a cause of action and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the action.
The sole assignment of error is:
“The Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint and dismissing the plaintiff’s case and cause.”
The amended complaint, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Everart v. FischerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Dixon v. GriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bobell v. WagenaarOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Hamilton v. McIndooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Rossman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Department of Human Services v. K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012