Legal Opinion

Christman v. Scott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, C. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the circuit court which was entered in favor of the defendant after the appellant had introduced his evidence and the court had sustained a demurrer submitted at that juncture by the respondent to the amended complaint. The demurrer was predicated upon contentions that the amended complaint did not state a cause of action and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the action.

The sole assignment of error is:

“The Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint and dismissing the plaintiff’s case and cause.”

The amended complaint, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Everart v. FischerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Dixon v. GriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bobell v. WagenaarOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hamilton v. McIndooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Rossman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Department of Human Services v. K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API