Ouriel v. Ouriel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in failing to grant defendant’s motion for recusal. "The presence of bias or prejudice on the part of a sitting Judge is generally a matter of personal conscience (Casterella v Casterella, 65 AD2d 614, 615, app dsmd 46 NY2d 939) and is, at best, a matter of discretionary disqualification” (Matter of Smith, 84 AD2d 664, 666; see, Judiciary Law § 14). The record does not support defendant’s contention that the court acted improperly.
We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Casterella v. CasterellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re the Estates of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Emory CC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993