Legal Opinion

The Brand

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 8, 1928No. 10272PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 F.2d 792 (1928)

THE BRAND.

PIPER

v.

KNUDSEN.

No. 10272.

District Court, D. Oregon.

October 8, 1928.

Lord & Moulton, of Portland, Or., for libelant.

Erskine Wood, Gunther F. Krause, and Wood, Montague & Matthiessen, all of Portland, Or., for claimant.

McNARY, District Judge.

At the time of his injury the libelant was a longshoreman employed by the Portland Stevedoring Company in loading the motorship Brand, which was moored at a dock in the city of Portland, Or.

The libel avers that the officers of the Brand furnished a gangplank as a means of access to and egress from the ship; that said officers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Aurora Shipping Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  3. The AuroraDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1908
  4. The AuroraDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1910
  5. Piper v. KnudsenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ford v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. Ex Rel. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  3. Richards v. MonahanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
  4. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. The Shang HoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API