Legal Opinion

United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1922No. 3878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

Two causes of action are presented on writs of error to review judgments of the court below, rendered in favor of the defendant in error and adjudging that no penalty be recovered against it for alleged violations of the Hours of Service Act (Comp. St. §■§ 8677-8680). The first cause of action only was tried; the second, by stipulation, being dependent upon the disposition of the first. There was no controversy as to the facts. They were evidenced by a stipulation and by the testimony of Carman, the conductor, whose employment was claimed to have been in violation of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United Transportation Union v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
  4. United Transportation Union v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of Transportation, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API