In re Haynes
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Respondent, David D. Haynes, was charged in a single count complaint with violating Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and the Respondent have reached an agreement pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11(d), which they now tender for this Court's approval. The Respondent has also submitted his affidavit as required by Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 17(a).
The parties have agreed, and we find that the Respondent is a member of the Bar of this State and is…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re HelmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1994