Legal Opinion

In re Helmer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1994No. 49S00-9211-DI-925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

R. Larry Helmer, the Respondent here, was charged by verified complaint for disciplinary action with violating Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have tendered for this Court's approval a Statement of Cireumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, wherein the parties agree that a suspension from the practice of law for six (6) months is an appropriate disciplinary measure. - Respondent has tendered the requisite affidavit pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17. We…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of FroschIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re HaynesIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rene DiBenedetto v. Timothy DevereuxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Rene DiBenedetto v. Timothy DevereuxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API