Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldstein v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided July 1, 1938No. Claim No. 24726Published

1DissentRyan, J.

I must respectfully dissent from the determination of my esteemed colleagues to dismiss this claim upon the motion made by the Attorney-General. To begin with, the claim here presented is not in the nature of a demand for compensation or pension by the dependents of a deceased member of the militia. On the contrary, it is a cause of action granted by the Decedent Estate Law, section 130 (formerly Code Civ. Proc. § 1902), and fully recognized in respect to the State as a defendant by the jurisdictional provision of the Court of Claims Act found in section 12 of the Court of Claims Act. Section…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Claim of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Jackson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Farrington v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Green v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API