Legal Opinion

Hussey v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. Pension & Benefit Plan

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided May 23, 1997No. Civil Action 6:96-0402PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are cross motions for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

The parties substantially agree on the operative facts. DuPont maintains a Pension and Benefit Plan (the Plan) for its employees. One of the benefits available to DuPont employees who have reached the age of fifty with at least twenty-five years of continuous service is a post-retirement joint and surviv- or annuity under which an employee may elect to have his pension reduced to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. Bernstein v. CapitalCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. Brogan v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Devine v. American Benefit Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
  2. Devine v. American Benefit Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API