Legal Opinion

Bleecker Street Management Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 12, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered October *17526, 2000, which denied petitioner’s application to annul the determination of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) that certain apartments in a residential cooperative remain subject to rent control, and that there are no unique or peculiar circumstances warranting an adjustment of rents for such apartments, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

At issue is whether Real Property Tax Law § 489 (7) (b) (2), as amended by chapter 289 (§ 2) of the Laws of 1985, applies to rent controlled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Salvati v. EimickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Sack v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Haberman v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Ames 2304, LLC v. City of Ames, Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API