Legal Opinion

Haberman v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered June 1, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion to renew or reargue an order, same court (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered December 21, 2000, upon the parties’ motions for summary judgment, declaring that certain cooperative apartments are subject to rent control and will remain so until vacancies occur therein, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The appeal must be dismissed since orders denying reargument are not appealable (see, Cross v Cross, 112 AD2d 62, 64). Although the motion was denominated by plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cross v. CrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Bleecker Street Management Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C.R. v. Pleasantville Cottage SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Rosen v. RosenholcAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Hollander v. Robert Plan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API