Legal Opinion

Roberts & Hoge, Inc. v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

Under C. S., 469, if the facts embodied in the affidavit of defendants are true, and they were taken as true on the argument before us, the proper venue for the trial of this cause is in Sampson County. In this view of the record, C. S., 470, provides that if the county designated for that purpose in the summons and complaint is not the proper county, the action may, however, be tried therein unless the defendant, before the time for answering expires, demands in writing that the trial be conducted in the proper county, and the place of trial is thereupon changed by consent of parties or by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Town of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Co. v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Brown v. Cogdell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Swift and Company v. Dan-Cleve Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Mitchell v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Casstevens v. Wilkes Telephone Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API