Legal Opinion

Holden v. Bloom

United States District Court

Decided May 9, 1941No. Nos. 2843, 2844Published

1Opinion of the CourtHenchey, J.

(Pettingell, A.P.J., & Wilson, J.)—These are two actions of tort which were tried together. In the first action the plaintiff, a minor ten years of age, seeks to recover for injuries caused by the defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile on Pearl Street, Newton, Mass., on July 28, 1939. In the second case, the father of the plaintiff in the first action seeks to recover for consequential damages arising from the aforesaid injury. In our opinion we will refer to the minor plaintiff as the plaintiff, inasmuch as the rights of his father are dependent upon the outcome of the first action.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Forbes v. Gordon & Gerber, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Towle v. MorinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API