Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 23, 1997No. 24732Published
1Opinion of the Court
329 S.C. 310 (1997)
494 S.E.2d 813
Ethel MILLER, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN and The Kendall Company, Defendants, Of whom The Kendall Company is Petitioner.
Henry MILLER, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN and The Kendall Company, Defendants, Of whom The Kendall Company is Petitioner.
Henry MILLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fletcher Levar Miller, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN and The Kendall Company, Defendants, Of whom The Kendall Company is Petitioner.
Henry MILLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Felicia Tyrette Miller, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN and The Kendall Company,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Jefferson County School District R-1 v. Justus ex rel. JustusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Mozingo v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- R.A. Peck, Inc. v. Liberty Federal Savings BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.