Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1939No. 34,435PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by.Hoci-i, J.:

This was an action to foreclose a lien on real estate. Plaintiffs prevailed, and defendant appeals.

The question presented is whether the defendant was bound by judgments previously entered in a partition suit which involved a certain antenuptial agreement.

John H. Baldwin and Phoebe Jane Manship were married in 1928. Baldwin had two sons, Joseph E. Baldwin and Robert A. Baldwin, from a former marriage. Prior to the marriage an antenuptial agreement was executed under which Phoebe Jane Manship surrendered such rights as she would otherwise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyde v. HydeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. U. P. Railway Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Cowle v. CowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Melton v. EverySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Schermerhorn v. MahaffieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Neville v. HennighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. O'Hearn v. O'HearnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  5. Brooks v. National Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API