Baldwin v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by.Hoci-i, J.:
This was an action to foreclose a lien on real estate. Plaintiffs prevailed, and defendant appeals.
The question presented is whether the defendant was bound by judgments previously entered in a partition suit which involved a certain antenuptial agreement.
John H. Baldwin and Phoebe Jane Manship were married in 1928. Baldwin had two sons, Joseph E. Baldwin and Robert A. Baldwin, from a former marriage. Prior to the marriage an antenuptial agreement was executed under which Phoebe Jane Manship surrendered such rights as she would otherwise…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hyde v. HydeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- U. P. Railway Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Cowle v. CowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Melton v. EverySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Schermerhorn v. MahaffieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Neville v. HennighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- O'Hearn v. O'HearnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- Brooks v. National Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.