O'Hearn v. O'Hearn
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
*79OPINION
BEVILACQUA, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a decree of the Family Court denying defendant’s motion to correct a computational error in the calculation of the defendant’s monthly living expenses. We conclude that the trial justice did not err in denying the motion that was brought pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Rules of Procedure for Domestic Relations.1
The following facts have been established. In October 1979 a hearing was held before the Family Court to determine the husband’s monthly living expenses wherein defendant testified that he required $125 per month to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Walling v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- A. B. C. Truck Lines, Inc. v. KenemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- DeFusco v. GiorgioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Van Donselaar v. Van DonselaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pari v. PariSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- Mansolillo v. Employee Retirement Board of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- Office of the Attorney Gen. v. Nationwide Pools, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Office of the Attorney Gen. v. Nationwide Pools, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS v. NATIONWIDE POOLS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019