United States v. Holt
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GRUNICK, Judge:
Following his conviction, appellant submitted clemency matters to the convening authority, pursuant to R.C.M. 1105 and 1106. An “Addendum to SJA Recommendation” was submitted to the convening authority as a result of appellant’s submissions. The addendum was signed by the trial counsel, Lieutenant Colonel C, in his role as acting staff judge advocate. We find that trial counsel was disqualified to advise the convening authority and we set aside the convening authority’s action. Article 6(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806(c) (1988), and R.C.M. 1106(b).
The allied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. FelixU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. McCormickU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. GrinterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. SpearsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- Stirewalt v. PlutaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- Stirewalt v. PlutaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. GonyeaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996