Legal Opinion

Krigbaum v. Sbarbaro

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1913No. Civ. No. 1164PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint, without leave to amend.

The demurrer is both general and special, and thus the complaint is challenged not only for want of sufficient facts, but upon the ground that it is ambiguous, uncertain, and unintelligible.

The object of the action, is to obtain judgment for damages alleged to have been inflicted upon the plaintiff by the defendants by wrongfully and fraudulently, so it is charged, preventing him from consummating the sale of certain real property, devoted to the growing of…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Group Health Cooperative v. King County Medical SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. California Auto Court Association v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API