Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ActioN by W. A. Curtis against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal: (1) Because not docketed seven days before beginning tho call of the district to which it belongs, as required by Rule 5 ; (2) because the record was not printed in the time required by Rule 34; (3) because the appellant has not printed and filed a brief in time required by Rules 28 and 34. It is only necessary to quote what was said upon an identical motion in Benedict v. Jones, 131 N. C., 474: “The uniform ruling of this court * * * -may be thus summed up: An appeal must be docketed not later than the termination of the next term of this Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benedict v. Jones.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. William v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Laney v. . MacKeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Craddock v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Foy v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API