Legal Opinion

Foy v. . Gray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ActioN beard on exceptions to report of referee, by W. B. Allen, J., at chambers, 27 July, 1908, from Obaven. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, 0. J.

The plaintiff did not docket his appeal “seven days before the call of the cases of the district to which it belongs.” Rule 5. If the appellee had moved to dismiss at that time or at any later day prior to the actual docketing of the transcript on appeal, the motion must have been allowed. Rule 17. But the appellee deferred making the motion till the call of the district had begun, and before that time the appeal had been docketed. The appellee was thus himself guilty of laches, and his motion to dismiss is denied. Cr addock v. Barnes, 140 N. C., 428; Curtis v. Railroad, 137 N.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunavant v. Caldwell & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Collins v. Young Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Curtis v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. . MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API