Legal Opinion
National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 6, 2006No. C 06-01802 MHPPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER Re: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs National Federation of the Blind, National Federation of the Blind of California, Bruce Sexton, and all those similarly situated, filed this action against Target Corporation (“Target”), seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. Plaintiffs claim that Target.com is inaccessible to the blind, and thereby violates federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination against the disabled. Now before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. v. Cable News Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Young v. FACEBOOK, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Cullen v. Netflix, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.