FINAU
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision 4t1700 MATTER OF FINAII In Deportation Proceedings A-13054549 Decided by Board February 10, 1967 Although respondent's business is that of an independent landscape contractor, since the evidence shows he is skilled and qualified in authentic Polynesian construction ; remodels and redecorates restaurants with Hawaiian-style thatch roofs ; has contracts for the construction of canoe houses, native houses, and buildings of historical interest amounting to opprosiroately $20,000; has an original investment of more than $1,000 in trucks and other equipment and employs one person…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Madhukant Jinabhai Mehta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- HEITLANDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
- Eleftherios Michael Pistentis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- LEEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975