Legal Opinion

Claim of Parisi v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue is whether claimant was in the course of his employment at the time of his injury. On August 31, 1928, at five-five p. m., which was five minutes after quitting time, claimant was attempting to board an automobile truck of his employer. The truck started while he was so doing and be fell to the ground causing injury to his leg and one of his fingers. The men were paid from the time they started work at eight A. m. until they stopped work at five p. m. The employer was constructing a sewer for a new street which had not yet been opened. The truck carried an air compressor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Matter of Schultz v. Beaver Products Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Claim of Schultz v. Beaver Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Claim of Gillette v. Rochester Vulcanite Paving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of White v. Consolidated Aircraft Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Claim of Smith v. Aerovane Utilities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API