Legal Opinion

Claim of Smith v. Aerovane Utilities Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1931Published

1Opinion of the Court

Award reversed and claim dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, with costs against the State Industrial Board (Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co., 252 N. Y. 394; Matter of Copeland v. Foundation Co., 231 App. Div. 781; revd., 256 N. Y. 568); and because the employee when injured was not in the course of his employment. (Schultz v. Beaver Products Co., Inc., 223 App. Div. 582; affd., 250 N. Y. 565; Matter of Parisi v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus, 230 App. Div. 140.) All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes to affirm.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Matter of Copeland v. Foundation CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Matter of Schultz v. Beaver Products Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Claim of Schultz v. Beaver Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Claim of Parisi v. Whitmore, Rauber & VicinusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API