Legal Opinion

Clabaugh v. Southern Wholesale Grocers' Ass'n

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama

Decided September 15, 1910No. 1,279PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action" by Hinton G. Clabaugh against the Southern Wholesale Grocers’ Association and othets. On motion by defendant for direction of verdict.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This is a suit instituted by Mr. Clabaugh against the Southern Wholesale Grocers’ Association, a corporation, for damages to his business, alleged to have been caused by interference with it by the Southern Wholesale Grocers’ Association by preventing the manufacturers from selling goods to him, by him to be gold to retailers. The action was brought under what is known as the “Sherman Anti-Trust Law,” enacted by the Congress of the United States. Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200). Whether there has been a violation of that act by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montague & Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  4. Straus v. American Publishers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  5. Allen Bradley Co. v. LOCAL NO. 3, IB OF E. WORKERSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API