Legal Opinion
Ernest Leroy Smith v. Oregon State Board of Parole
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1997No. 96-36222Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
124 F.3d 212
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ernest Leroy SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
OREGON STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 96-36222.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted September 8, 1997.
Filed September 26, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Oregon, CV-95-00111-REJ; Robert E. Jones,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pedro Aponte v. James H. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections Attorney General for the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Ronald R. Weaver v. Manfred MaassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994