Waitman v. Bowles
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern. District. William M. Springer, Judge. Action by R. P. Bowles against G. J.Waitman. Judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals. This action was commenced on the 27th day of August, 1894, before S. M. Rutherford, United States commissioner fprthe Second judicial division of the United States Court, Indian Territory.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern. District. William M. Springer, Judge. Action by R. P. Bowles against G. J.Waitman. Judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals. This action was commenced on the 27th day of August, 1894, before S. M. Rutherford, United States commissioner fprthe Second judicial division of the United States Court, Indian Territory. The plaintiff sues for a balance of $90.00 due on an account for $166.77. On September 10, 1894, both parties appear and announce “ready for trial,” jury was impaneled and case tried, and the jury returned the following…
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Motion for New Trial. The appellant has filed one specification of error, which is as follows: “The court erred in allowing the United States commissioner, S. M. Rutherford, to sign on the 15th day of November, 1897, the transcript which had formerly been sent up in this case, and in overruling defendant’s motion to set aside the judgment, and .for a new trial.” The judgment in this case was rendered on November 2, 1897, and the record discloses that a motion for new trial was filed on November 10, 1897, but the same hasnobbsen brought up by the bill of exeeptins, andan amended motion for new…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maloney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Nichols v. ShearonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Smith v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
- Hughes v. WheatSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Young v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weintraub v. RudnickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928