Legal Opinion

Paul J. Niemeier v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Charles F. C. Ruff, Special Prosecutor, Watergate Special Prosecution Force

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 9, 1977No. 76-2296PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether an undisclosed portion of a memorandum to the Watergate Special Prosecutor from the Counsel to the Special Prosecutor is exempt from disclosure under

I

Plaintiff requested from Watergate Special Prosecutor Charles F. C. Ruff a copy of the August 29, 1974, memorandum written by Philip Lacovara, then Counsel to the Special Prosecutor, and addressed to Leon Jaworski, then the Special Prosecutor. This request was denied initially on the ground that the Lacovara memorandum was governed by exemption five of the FOIA, 5…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Access Reports v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. Rockwell International Corp. v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Providence Journal Company and Gerald M. Carbone v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API