Legal Opinion

Roy E. Dooley, Jr. v. American Airlines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 5, 1986No. 85-1830PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, retired pilots of American Airlines, brought this four count complaint pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). They sought to enforce their rights under an American Airlines defined benefit pension plan. The district court, on cross-motions for summary judgment, held that the alleged ERISA violations were unfounded. Accordingly, the court entered judgment in favor of the appellees on all four counts. While we agree with the district court’s disposition of Count I, we disagree with its disposition of Counts II through IV.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milo John Munson v. Wendell R. Friske, John Rybak, Jr., Kenneth Todd, and Ashland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. George Stewart v. National Shopmen Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Carle Foundation, an Illinois Not for Profit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Krumme v. Westpoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. John Cottillion v. United Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. Kirkendall v. Halliburton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Richardson v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API